Gien plates
Summary: tanette21 expresses her dissatisfaction with the excessive use of plastic and polystyrene packaging when she orders tableware online. She calls on eBay to require more eco-friendly packaging practices. koalagris and francexpressdeal defend the need to properly protect tableware during delivery to avoid damage, saying that good packaging is essential and that a return cannot be justified by too much protection. *miss-tigri* suggests buying at flea markets to avoid packaging and transport problems.
A complete absurdity when today shredded paper, cardboard, and corrugated cardboard exist. I solemnly ask eBay’s management to require its sellers to prohibit such use of plastic, and especially of POLYSTYRENE in their packaging, under penalty of immediate return, at their expense. Renée Cassin
3 comments
*miss-tigri*
Mentor11 months agoIf you want to be eco-friendly, go to flea markets: no pollution from transport or packaging....
francexpressdeal
Mentor11 months ago@tanette21
l'essentiel vous a été dit par @koalagris (Salutations à toi ô koalagris 🙂).
Pour autant, je me permets d'intervenir car j'ai une question qui reste en suspend à la lecture de votre post : êtes-vous sérieuse ? 🤔
Ne pensez-vous pas qu'il aurait été plus risqué d'emballer de la vaisselle avec je cite "papier, carton en charpie et carton ondulé" ?
Merci d'avance pour votre réponse car sinon je vais mal dormir cette nuit.
PS : inutile de tenter de mettre en avant un problème de respect de l'environnement pour justifier vos propos plus que déplacés.
koalagris
Mentor11 months agoSince the seller is responsible for the proper delivery of the order, and given the mistreatment parcels endure on sorting lines, over-packaging dishes is absolutely not out of place at all (double boxing is even recommended).
"I solemnly ask eBay’s management to require its sellers to forbid this kind of use of plastic" = eBay has no business demanding anything in this regard; if there’s breakage, they’ll just take the funds back from the seller’s account, while still keeping their commission fees, so what legitimacy would they have to impose a "light" package?
"at risk of immediate return, at their expense" = an item that’s too well packed is in no way a reason for return, let alone at the customer’s expense...
That’s the very first time in 20 years that I’ve read someone complaining that their orders were too protected during shipping — now that’s really topsy-turvy!
All the best to you too 😕